The three major telecommunications operators are born with the "挨骂" label. In the current environment, anyone can ask the communication operator about the mother, but not the same industry that is related to the power, oil, etc. of the state-owned enterprises. Any disrespect. Of course, this article is not to discuss the root causes of the differences in the status of state-owned enterprises, but to explore the "telecom fraud" cases that have recently been listed in the topic center.
Perhaps in the majority of people's perceptions, the "telecom fraud" cases have been repeatedly banned, the three major telecom operators and their respective virtual operators with telecommunications basic business operations, etc., are not the main offenders but also accomplices. Because of the summarization, these cases are inseparable from the following influencing factors: information leakage is the source of telecom fraud, telecom operators fail to implement real-name system, virtual operators are management loopholes, public security departments are not effective, and the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology is not strict. The bank did not carefully review the real name card.
Some people think that according to the technical level of communication operators, in ordinary traffic and traffic monitoring, abnormal traffic should be very easy to detect and early warning, just because they do not control at the source, so there is a follow-up Various loopholes.
Actually, it is the author's opinion. This statement is still too one-sided. Although the author is not screaming for communication operators, but blaming a social problem on a company, this kind of attitude and way of doing things is obviously unfair. Just like selling a knife is responsible for the murderer who buys a knife. This alone can't prevent such an incident from the power of selling a knife. What's more, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology had no obvious effect on the implementation of the real-name system for many years. Only after adopting the compulsory shutdown policy some time ago, this situation has improved, but this is not really a real name, because selling cards on the street, stealing other people's documents. The phone card after the real name has not been significantly reduced.
Of course, if we want to analyze the crackdown of the public security department, the bank's actions, the darkness of human nature, etc., the analysis of such events can be a social issue.
Finally, do you think that the "telecom fraud" case, the communication operator is not an accomplice? If you have to take responsibility, how much should the communication operator pay?
Projector Lamp,Projector Light Bulb,Projector Lamp Replacement,Projector Bulb Replacement
Shenzhen Happybate Trading Co.,LTD , https://www.happybateprojector.com