Who is boycotting the Beijing Olympics?

- Xingbang Industry Information Network users talk about boycotting Carrefour's behavior â–¡ Article finishing / This reporter Li Ye online a call to everyone during the May 1 period not to go to Carrefour shopping posts were widely reprinted and heated discussion. At the same time, a long text message that appealed to people not to go to the supermarket for a full 17 days is also blooming in the world. It is said that because Carrefour's major shareholder Louis Vuitton-Mott Hennessy Group was suspected of funding "Tibet independence" and what happened during the Olympic torch relay in Paris, netizens first began to boycott LV, and these days they turned their finger to Carrefour. Some netizens criticized this boycott and called for calm treatment. The two sides debated in various online community forums. Carrefour China District solemnly issued a "Declaration" response in the domestic media on the 16th. "The Carrefour Group has never and will not do anything that hurts the feelings of the Chinese people in the future." "The rumors about the Carrefour Group supporting individual illegal political organizations are completely out of nothing." And there is no basis.". Please see the comments of users of Xingbang Industry Information Network () on this matter.

Does the Carrefour incident come to the fore?
正方 ■ User "Ben Laden"
Core point of view: Follow-up does not mean who initiated the boycott? Who was the first to stand at the Carrefour door to protest? Who organized a huge movement? What is the driving force behind this? Everything doesn't know! Among the protesters, 90% of the population just followed suit. I often receive text messages from Carrefour that are ruined. Is this text true? I don't know! I hope that the major media will reveal the truth of the facts.
Counterparty â–  User "peace missile"
The core point of view: It is not a hole that does not come to the wind. We did not point the finger at Wal-Mart, Carrefour, Metro, Auchan and other supermarkets, but separately for Carrefour, to fund the "Tibet independence", the destruction of the Olympics and the passing of the Holy Fire in China. These are definitely not a hole in the wind. The first person to eat crabs is a hero. Similarly, the first person who pointed the cannon at Carrefour is a hero.
Who benefits from the wave of resistance?
正方 ■ Netizen "in-depth report"
The core point of view: Resisting the Olympics is the ultimate goal to look at the sabotage of Americans: widely spread the article against Carrefour among netizens, send pre-existing spies, create chaos in the crowd, and cause the Chinese to fight the country's happy scene. Next is their most vicious action: use the world's major media to broadcast the scene of Chinese people fighting Carrefour, and give the Chinese a "mob barbaric" hat, and then create negative images in Europe and the United States, thus resisting the Olympics. the goal of.
Counterparty â–  User "engryittt"
Core point of view: Not just resisting the Olympics?
The United States used China to boycott the law of the country, and then provoked the relationship between the EU and China. Carrefour withdrew from China and acquired all its stores at a low price by Wal-Mart in the United States. The implementation of this plan, then the benefits of the United States are: 1. American companies gain huge economic benefits; 2. Combat EU companies and trade between China and the EU; 3. Use the May 1 Chinese cities to fight Carrefour In the context of world public opinion, we will have a negative impact on the image of China’s big country!


Is it on paper to take action?
正方|Users "Don't go far"
Core point of view: mutual communication, the whole people boycott I want to ask what is the ultimate purpose of boycotting Carrefour, is it to give the French people a look at the Chinese people? How long does it take to boycott Carrefour? Can you go after May 1st? Still ready to let Carrefour withdraw from China! We cannot allow foreign companies that resist the Olympics and disrupt the normal order of the country to do whatever they want in China. I suggest that everyone spreads to each other, communicates with each other, and the whole people boycott!
Counterparty â–  User "Flying Wolf"
Core point of view: Using action to boycott Carrefour and condemning all attempts to undermine the Olympic atmosphere, I agree with both hands. But we should not only stay on the slogan, but should use action to express it. Now everyone is constantly receiving, copying and pasting posts on QQ, wasting a lot of time and energy. Is this patriotic? I think this is a hot, boring move, putting all my energy into action, this is the real patriotism!
Why is it only for Carrefour?
正方 ■ User "鹭鸶"
The core point of view: France is too arrogant to disturb the torch relay in Paris, and London has also interfered with why it does not boycott B&Q. San Francisco is also making trouble, Americans are even more shameless, CNN tells us that we are mobs, so why not resist Wal-Mart? There are too many boycotts of the Olympics, although I don’t know what Carrefour’s boss has done? We are used to letting a company do the target of sabotaging the Olympics.
Counterparty â–  Netizen "Mu Zi Li"
The core point of view: The United States is too smart. The Americans are too smart. They have to say that low-key admission, the operation behind them, everything is their instigation behind them. In disturbing Chinese society, on the surface, shaking hands with China, actually behind the scenes. I have done a lot of action. Anyway, all political movements and social contradictions are triggered by the economy.
(User views do not represent the position of this newspaper)
Editor: Li Yi layout: Lai Xinchao refers to: Peng Anjun final review: Yao Xiaohong

T6 LED Dive flashlight

Led Flashlight,Diving Flashlight,Led Rechargeable Flashlight

Thefirst International Lighting Co., Ltd. , http://www.gddivinglight.com